| Cryptocurrency | Price (USDT) |
|---|---|
| BTC | $107341.1900000000 |
| ETH | $2429.7350000000 |
| BNB | $647.4894800000 |
| XRP | $2.1842840000 |
| ADA | $0.5642971000 |
| SOL | $150.2594000000 |
| DOGE | $N/A |
| DOT | $3.3967000000 |
| LTC | $86.0273000000 |
| LINK | $13.3416700000 |
Category: CRYPTO NEWS
The post Samourai Wallet: Crucial Shift in New York AG Lawsuit appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The world of cryptocurrency regulation is constantly evolving, and sometimes, we see unexpected twists. A recent development suggests a significant shift in the legal challenges facing a prominent crypto privacy tool. Reports indicate that the New York AG might be considering a pivotal move regarding the Samourai Wallet lawsuit, potentially impacting the broader landscape of DOJ Crypto enforcement and the use of cryptocurrency mixing services. What Sparked the Samourai Wallet Crypto Lawsuit? Before diving into the latest news, it’s important to understand the origins of the legal troubles for Samourai Wallet. The core of the issue stems from allegations that the service facilitated illegal activities. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) took significant action against the platform and its founders, Keonne Rodriguez and William Lonergan Hill. The DOJ’s charges were serious, alleging that Samourai Wallet operated as an unlicensed money transmitting business and engaged in money laundering. Specifically, the DOJ claimed that the service processed over $100 million in criminal proceeds. This wasn’t just a minor regulatory slap on the wrist; it involved federal criminal charges, highlighting the government’s focus on illicit finance within the crypto space. The allegations centered on the wallet’s primary function: enhancing transaction privacy. While privacy is a sought-after feature in the crypto world, tools like Samourai Wallet’s coin mixing capabilities can be used to obscure the origin and destination of funds, making them attractive to cybercriminals, fraudsters, and other illicit actors. The DOJ argued that the founders not only knew this but actively promoted the service as a way to bypass regulations and law enforcement scrutiny. Key points from the initial DOJ action included: Charges against co-founders Keonne Rodriguez and William Lonergan Hill. Allegations of operating an unlicensed money transmitting business. Claims of facilitating over $100 million in criminal proceeds. Focus on the platform’s privacy…
2025-04-30T03:44:13+00:00